new lint: into_iter_without_iter
#11587
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rustbot
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
y21
force-pushed
the
into_iter_without_iter
branch
2 times, most recently
from
7cf95be to
d1bb843
Compare
Jarcho
reviewed
Sep 30, 2023
y21
force-pushed
the
into_iter_without_iter
branch
from
d1bb843 to
8eb586d
Compare
|
Thank you. @bors r+ |
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-action_dev_test, checks-action_remark_test, checks-action_test |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes #9736 (part 2)
This implements the other lint that my earlier PR missed: given an
IntoIterator for &Typeimpl, check that there exists an inherentfn iter(&self)method.changelog: new lint:
into_iter_without_iterr? @Jarcho since you reviewed #11527 I figured it makes sense for you to review this as well?